fixing a bunch of broken stuff I think
This commit is contained in:
parent
0dbc3ead0e
commit
8bace887a2
1551 changed files with 299 additions and 57481 deletions
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The recent news of the Steamdeck coming with an immutable filesystem made me curious. I've tried Fedora Silverblue in the past and really liked it in concept. I just like Arch as a distro more.</p> <p>So, could i set this up myself? The Arch wiki doesn't seem to provide info on that. Could i wrap my core arch install into an immutable state and put my stuff on top of that? Potentially choosing one of my "setups" at boot, having the immutable core underneath and multiple different states on top? </p> <p>There are several uses that come to mind for me personally, not the least of which the fact that i like to "play" with my system and test stuff out. Having the option to run a different overlay for testing the latest plasma version while having a dependable, working xfce setup completely seperated seems like a decent idea.</p> <p>I know Silverblue uses ostree for that, and that doesn't seem to be distro specific. I'm not looking for a step by step tutorial, but an idea where to look to set something like this up.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/domsch1988"> /u/domsch1988 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/r4w51u/arch_silverblue/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/r4w51u/arch_silverblue/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/r2zrfh/i3wm_second_rice/"> <img src="https://preview.redd.it/bwljvvskz0281.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=39a89264e79ebe711efa772c3033da79fb387c73" alt="[i3wm] Second Rice." title="[i3wm] Second Rice." /> </a> </td><td>   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/ThatOneNerd01"> /u/ThatOneNerd01 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/bwljvvskz0281.jpg">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/r2zrfh/i3wm_second_rice/">[comments]</a></span> </td></tr></table>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<p>Today I came across this great summary of the concept of interactive programming:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote>
|
||||
<p>Development in Common Lisp is interactive. There’s no separate compile/run/debug cycle. Instead of that, the program is developed while it runs. Compilation is incremental, and functions can be created and updated on the fly. As the program is running, all objects are available and can be inspected all the time. This is much more than a simple REPL; the whole environment, from the IDE to the language is prepared for this type of development.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>– https://common-lisp.net/features</p>
|
||||
</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Obviously, this is not something specific to Common Lisp and it applies to most Lisp dialects and many other programming languages.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>I was first exposed to interactive programming when studying Common Lisp in 2005. Back then I came across <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUpAvqa5hQw">a SLIME screencast</a> by Marco Baringer that blew my mind (I was mostly programming in C++ and Java at the time).<sup id="fnref:1"><a class="footnote" href="https://batsov.com/articles/2021/12/24/interactive-programming-in-a-nutshell/#fn:1" rel="footnote">1</a></sup> Today such a workflow feels just as magical and special as it did all those years ago.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>For me interactive programming is probably <em>the most important advantage</em> of Lisps and Emacs over other programming languages and editors. I cannot imagine any productive workflow without it!</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>I’ve written a bit about interactive programming with Clojure and Emacs <a href="https://docs.cider.mx/cider/usage/interactive_programming.html">here</a>. Still, I always feel that this is one of those concepts that you can’t really understand until you’ve experienced it. Just like the Matrix.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<div class="footnotes">
|
||||
<ol>
|
||||
<li id="fn:1">
|
||||
<p>I still have it on my todo list to record a similar screencast for CIDER. <a class="reversefootnote" href="https://batsov.com/articles/2021/12/24/interactive-programming-in-a-nutshell/#fnref:1">↩</a></p>
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been using arch Linux for a couple of months now and I decided I wanted to build my own custom Linux kernel. I’ve followed some tutorials online and I couldn’t get it to work. I’ve also tried following the arch Linux guide online but I couldn’t get it to work. The problem is, I boot into it, doesn’t seem like there’s any problems but I get a black screen. I use Grub2Win so I dual boot. Any suggestions?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/5SpeedDiseal"> /u/5SpeedDiseal </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/r86ss2/building_custom_linux_kernel/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/r86ss2/building_custom_linux_kernel/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi guys, I've been trying to export org source-code results with pandoc, but to no avail. they don't seem to respect <code>#+PROPERTY: header-args :exports both</code>. If it can be done, how can I make <code>org-md-export-to-markdown</code> export with syntax highlighting (``` syntax`). Thanks.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/hungry_m8"> /u/hungry_m8 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/qyb119/how_can_i_convert_org_to_md_preferably_github/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/qyb119/how_can_i_convert_org_to_md_preferably_github/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone!</p> <p>Title says. What's the best way to define key bindings so i can easily turn them on / off.</p> <p>I was thinking creating a empty / bare bones minor mode and attaching all my binding customizations to it. Is it good idea or is there a better way?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/rtwyyn"> /u/rtwyyn </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/r1i7bh/whats_the_best_way_to_define_key_bindings_that/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/r1i7bh/whats_the_best_way_to_define_key_bindings_that/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue