fixing a bunch of broken stuff I think
This commit is contained in:
parent
0dbc3ead0e
commit
8bace887a2
1551 changed files with 299 additions and 57481 deletions
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/q8jfrp/sway_ditching_x11_for_wayland_first_rice_yall_be/"> <img src="https://external-preview.redd.it/AAk1wOpn-5w_f5F563wyQ81lPkZwvmhRRX_Jh9O9UFg.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=ecc9e0b1c39f0e4a32b1eef5f4a5f6aa439fb9aa" alt="[sway] ditching X11 for Wayland, first rice, y'all be nice." title="[sway] ditching X11 for Wayland, first rice, y'all be nice." /> </a> </td><td>   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/puerae"> /u/puerae </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://v.redd.it/owla7byefkt71">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/q8jfrp/sway_ditching_x11_for_wayland_first_rice_yall_be/">[comments]</a></span> </td></tr></table>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>By default, it seems that Guix installs the EFI bootloader to "EFI/Guix/grubx64.efi".</p> <p>I want to specify the location in config.scm, so that Guix installs the bootloader to the standard "EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI", where even the dumbest UEFI implementations will find it automatically.</p> <p>My imperative solution is to manually move the EFI file after every Guix update, but that is easy to forget. I'd rather solve the problem declaratively with Guix. I could not find any way to specify the bootloader location in the Guix manual, so I'm asking here.</p> <p>I am also curious if Guix supports installing both a BIOS bootloader and an EFI bootloader simultaneousy (I haven't tested it yet). I used to do this on OpenBSD because it maximizes my chances of being able to boot successfully on any x86_64 system.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/less-to-worry-about"> /u/less-to-worry-about </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/GUIX/comments/ri3v1t/how_to_specify_where_the_efi_bootloader_installs/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/GUIX/comments/ri3v1t/how_to_specify_where_the_efi_bootloader_installs/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/pourr6/kde_not_much_but_everything_i_need/"> <img src="https://preview.redd.it/kzzrdj3ccpn71.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=240546bc1ad56ec7a6d69a8c210a75499ff173bc" alt="[kde] Not much, but everything I need." title="[kde] Not much, but everything I need." /> </a> </td><td>   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Specific-Fire-Fox"> /u/Specific-Fire-Fox </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/kzzrdj3ccpn71.png">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/pourr6/kde_not_much_but_everything_i_need/">[comments]</a></span> </td></tr></table>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello, I have an <code>/etc/issue</code> file. Until recently if I put <code>\l</code> in the file it displayed the current TTY I was on. But now it only displays a <code>-</code>. Any idea why this is happening?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/AdminSuggestion"> /u/AdminSuggestion </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/rst5lz/etcissue_l_is_outputting/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/rst5lz/etcissue_l_is_outputting/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Even if I have an empty ~/.vimrc i.e. delete all the lines, the document displays like <a href="https://i.imgur.com/Iuxab7B.png">this</a>. Only if I remove the file ~/.vimrc it <a href="https://i.imgur.com/MLFcdoB.png">resolves.</a> I'm new to vim, pls help.</p> <p>Edit: From the ArchWiki:</p> <blockquote> <p>Commonly expected behavior such as syntax highlighting is enabled in <code>defaults.vim</code>, which is loaded when no <code>~/.vimrc</code> is present. Add <code>let skip_defaults_vim=1</code> to <code>/etc/vimrc</code> to disable loading of <code>defaults.vim</code> completely.</p> </blockquote> <p>Means <code>defaults.vim</code> isn't loaded if <code>~/.vimrc</code> is present. This is what causing the problem. There was this <code>set display=truncate</code> line in <code>defaults.vim</code> running what solve the issue. So I put that in my vimrc and it's solved.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/WeirdAsQuantumWorld"> /u/WeirdAsQuantumWorld </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/rd5zgs/having_a_vimrc_shows_sign_instead_the_last_line/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/rd5zgs/having_a_vimrc_shows_sign_instead_the_last_line/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/q77c89/awesomewm_transparent/"> <img src="https://preview.redd.it/cumnnshcq6t71.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=08bdc5c3fb5bb6a0957462c5d84290711e35babf" alt="[AwesomeWM] TRANSPARENT" title="[AwesomeWM] TRANSPARENT" /> </a> </td><td>   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/StephenrRootEx"> /u/StephenrRootEx </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/cumnnshcq6t71.png">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/q77c89/awesomewm_transparent/">[comments]</a></span> </td></tr></table>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey, I wanted to do something useful at my leisure and created a new kernel. I need your opinion if I should continue working on it.</p> <p>Positron kernel was designed for normal usage cases (not for servers and latency-critical tasks). </p> <p>Here's a description:</p> <ul> <li>Based on latest stable vanilla kernel</li> <li>Clear Linux patchset</li> <li>Additional compiler optimisations</li> <li>Many optimisations by Sultan Alsawaf</li> <li>srandom - a super fast PRNG (passes dieharder tests)</li> <li>zram deduplication (would be useful for low RAM devices)</li> <li>Try to enable fast strings operations on supported CPUs when BIOS doesn't do this itself (happens on some laptops)<br/></li> </ul> <p>Source code can be found <a href="https://github.com/Positron-Foundation/linux">here</a></p> <p>Prebuilt pacman packages:</p> <p><a href="https://we.tl/t-q5VReHQeVi">Kernel</a></p> <p><a href="https://we.tl/t-MCHfvq2G8w">Headers</a></p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/dereference23"> /u/dereference23 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/r9djuc/positron_kernel/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/r9djuc/positron_kernel/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>You've almost certainly all heard this sentence before. As a new Emacs user and someone who does want to really get to know Emacs, I want to hear about all the pros and cons I have heard so far, from you guys. I'm really surprised how friendly this community is. I've never seen a more friendly online group ever. </p> <p>I am the guy that asked about "Emacs-Lisp functions beneath the surface" a few days ago. </p> <p>Anyway, I was watching <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWD1Fpdd4Pc&ab_channel=thoughtbot">this video</a> and there is something that caught my attention more than anything else. And that is the sentence at 14:00 : </p> <blockquote> <p>" Emacs is 12 MB, core with none of the Lisp extensions." </p> </blockquote> <p>Is this really true? Why is Emacs considered a bloat Software, in some communities, then? 12 MB doesn't seem much. </p> <p>And what do people mean when they say that Emacs is bloat or memory intensive? Is the core bloated?<br/> There are definitely people that are more for debating than actually addressing problems or having a discussion. So I'm really curious, is it that there is actually a real reason they are saying it, or is it just that it's a common "saying" of Vim users and users who find Emacs "too difficult"? </p> <p>Or is it that an average user uses so many packages that Emacs becomes CPU and/or memory intensive? </p> <p>What do you consider a bloat software?<br/> Also, even the guy in the video said that at 18:20: </p> <blockquote> <p>"All these things that people have said about Emacs having a big footprint and being memory intensive blah blah blah <strong><em>it's all true</em></strong>" </p> </blockquote> <p>I would love to hear your perspective on this commonly brought up "contention".</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/aqua_cap"> /u/aqua_cap </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/r7qah6/emacs_is_bloat_and_memory_intensive/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/r7qah6/emacs_is_bloat_and_memory_intensive/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi there. I am a new Emacs user, trying it after using Vim for a year or so.I'd say it's ambitious, but I've started from scratch. I didn't want to go with Spacemacs or Doom Emacs. </p> <p>Configuring init.el file got me thinking - What are all those functions? I know that ELisp is a dialect of a programming language called LISP, but knowing many languages ELisp seems so strange. It's absolutely peculiar. </p> <p>You all know that Python has been considered a "pseudo code" language in which you almost tell in human English what do you want to achieve.I actually believe that ELisp falls under that description much better. </p> <p>I don't understand what all those functions are doing below the surface. It seems to me that if I'd want to make a AI Chess game by my own rules, that the only thing I'd need to write in ELisp, would be: </p> <blockquote> <p>(setq AI-chess-my-own-rules t) </p> </blockquote> <p>And that would be it.<br/> Can I see the implementation of each function I have put in my init.el?How does, for example: </p> <blockquote> <p>(load theme 'doom-gruvbox) </p> </blockquote> <p>work? </p> <p>Can I see the implementation? Or (scroll-bar-mode -1)? How does that work? Does that tells the X to stop drawing the scroll-bar in Emacs? What is the language that those functions are written in, and where could I see, inside or outside of Emacs, the implementation of it? </p> <p>And how is it possible that I can type a name of any function written in ELisp and it will just work? Aren't there any libraries? How does that work? </p> <p>I believe these are trivial questions for you, but I am really new in this. I fell in love with the Org mode, but Emacs seems so strange. I got used to parenthesis, I get it - That's the syntax. Fine. I don't have a problem with it. But it's absolutely different than any other language I've ever used. </p> <p>Thanks in advance for replies. :)</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/aqua_cap"> /u/aqua_cap </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/r25owf/what_are_elisp_functions_below_the_surface/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/r25owf/what_are_elisp_functions_below_the_surface/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue