fixing a bunch of broken stuff I think
This commit is contained in:
parent
0dbc3ead0e
commit
8bace887a2
1551 changed files with 299 additions and 57481 deletions
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi,</p> <p>I have previously posted about my package dtache.el, which provides detachable shell commands to Emacs users. Today I merged the dtache-eshell.el library which provides the integration of dtache with eshell, previously dtache only supported M-x shell.</p> <p>You can read more about, and see some examples of dtache-eshell in action at <a href="https://niklaseklund.gitlab.io/blog/posts/dtache_eshell/">https://niklaseklund.gitlab.io/blog/posts/dtache_eshell/</a>, and if you are looking for the source code you will find it here <a href="https://gitlab.com/niklaseklund/dtache">https://gitlab.com/niklaseklund/dtache</a> :)</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/squirelpower"> /u/squirelpower </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/rsda1l/dtache_eshell_integration_of_dtache_in_eshell/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/rsda1l/dtache_eshell_integration_of_dtache_in_eshell/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, new to gang. I have a question to ask. I've been using Windows 10 pro in my dell inspiron 7472 which was preinstalled. I am thinking to switch to arch based OS. I need lightweight distro. So thinking of installing Endeavour OS or Manjaro. But I've a doubt about whether it'll work on my machine or not. Which distro shoud I go for and has anyone tried on dell inspiron 7472. All feedbacks are appreciated. Thank you.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/InfooGeek"> /u/InfooGeek </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/qze82x/arch_on_dell_inspiron_7472/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/qze82x/arch_on_dell_inspiron_7472/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Taking inspiration from Doom, I'm using a "local leader" setup to bind mode-relevant commands, like:</p> <pre><code>(general-create-definer local-leader-def :states '(normal visual motion) :prefix "SPC m") </code></pre> <p>This way, I can do stuff like <code>(local-leader-def :keymaps 'ledger-mode-map "r" 'ledger-report)</code>, making it super easy to access the report when I'm in ledger mode with a quick <code>SPC m r</code>. However, this approach starts to break down in more complicated scenarios, such as:</p> <pre><code>(local-leader-def :keymaps 'org-mode-map "a" '(:ignore t :wk "attachments") "a a" 'org-attach "a d" '(:ignore t :wk "deletion") "a d d" 'org-attach-delete-one "a d G" 'org-attach-delete-all "r" '(:ignore t :wk "refile") "r r" 'org-refile) </code></pre> <p>First, this is kind of ugly - Org has a ton of features, and I try to use a lot of them, so some of my key sequences can get pretty long. I end up retyping the same prefix many, many times, sometimes with multiple layers of the <code>(:ignore t :wk "foo")</code> trick (as seen above).</p> <p>Second, (and more annoyingly, IMO) doing it this way "shadows" the which-key description for modes which share a prefix. That is, if I'm in ledger mode and type "SPC m", it yields the suggestion "r -> refile" instead of "r -> ledger-report" as it should.</p> <p>I've been futzing around with general's ":prefix-command" and related facilities to try and figure out a way of avoiding this second issue, but so far I haven't been able to get anything to work. Since my current strategy is ad hoc and not based on any best practices I'm aware of, I thought I'd ask here if there's a canonical/idiomatic way of using general's capabilities to define groups of similarly-prefixed commands without breaking which-key.</p> <p>(Also, why is there a distinction between :prefix-command and :prefix-map? When do you need to store a keymap as the value of a function instead of as variable or vice versa?)</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/summetria"> /u/summetria </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/qxq0uh/idiomatic_way_of_defining_bindings_with_a_common/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/qxq0uh/idiomatic_way_of_defining_bindings_with_a_common/">[comments]</a></span>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1 +0,0 @@
|
|||
<p>Today we are going to spend time talking about Paul being shipwrecked. When was the last time you just felt like everything got wrecked? Doesn't that hurt? Don't we all feel at times like we are sunk? The crazy… <a href='/story.php?story_fbid=139974831465658&id=115628967233578'>More</a> thing is, even when everything was going wrong and nothing seemed good for Paul, he still clung to the Lord. And the Lord was still with him. I think of when Paul got bit by that snake, surely that was God showing him, that God is still with Paul.</p><a href='/story.php?story_fbid=139974831465658&id=115628967233578&m_entstream_source=timeline&__tn__=%2As%2As-R' aria-label='Open story' class='_5msj'></a><a href='/NorthernValleyTFC/photos/a.117554230374385/139974571465684/?type=3&source=48&__tn__=EH-R' class='_39pi'><img src='https://scontent.fict1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/s320x320/173220288_139974574799017_4723876781126188491_n.png?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=nWrS_pb1d3AAX9GL23C&_nc_ht=scontent.fict1-1.fna&oh=094b3e9dec60051ce5949127840f9fa3&oe=6168F5DC' /></a>
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue