chris/emacs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

trying to fix

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Chris Cochrun 2022-01-03 12:41:35 -06:00
parent fa407dfeb6
commit e013d7569e
22945 changed files with 447936 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
var/elfeed/db/data/d2/d29725a87cadbbbc44a5705e0ab579e12f607a00 Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Why is it neccissary to define the variable %standard-phases as a list of dotted pairs</p> <p><code>&#39;((symbol . procedure) ... )</code></p> <p>as shown in the documentation?</p> <p><code> (define %standard-phases ;; The list of standard phases (quite a few are omitted ;; for brevity). Each element is a symbol/procedure pair. (list (cons &#39;unpack unpack) (cons &#39;configure configure) (cons &#39;build build) (cons &#39;check check) (cons &#39;install install))) </code></p> <p>Don&#39;t the previous <code>(define* (symbol arguments) body)</code> already create a binding between symbol and procedure? And if so why can&#39;t a list of just the symbols suffice?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/PetriciaKerman"> /u/PetriciaKerman </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/GUIX/comments/pff8fm/question_about_guix_build_phases/">[link]</a></span> &#32; <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/GUIX/comments/pff8fm/question_about_guix_build_phases/">[comments]</a></span>